Procurement Integrity Act (PIA) Lawyers 41 USC 423
Nationwide Procurement Integrity Act Lawyers Helping You Minimize Costly Fines and Criminal Jail Time When It Comes to Ethics Violations in Government Contracting.
IMMEDIATE 24/7 DEFENSE FOR PROCUREMENT INTEGRITY ACT INVESTIGATIONS
Protecting Government Contractors, Federal Employees, and CEO Executives Nationwide. If you have received a subpoena, are under federal investigation, indicted, or have been served with a target letter for a violation of 41 USC 423, call our former federal prosecutors and government contracting officials NOW.
Are you a federal government construction contractor, government employee, or subcontractor who is under the Procurement Integrity Act investigation or facing criminal charges for procurement fraud under 41 USC 423 and FAR 3.104?
A Friendly Lunch, a “Confidential” Tip, and Now a Federal Indictment. This is How a Procurement Integrity Act Investigation Begins.
You are a program manager at a successful defense contracting firm. During a lunch with a government contracting official you’ve known for years, he casually mentions a competitor’s struggles on a recent project—information that could give your company a significant edge on an upcoming bid. You use that information to refine your proposal. Months later, federal agents arrive at your office with a search warrant. You are now the target of a criminal investigation for violating the Procurement Integrity Act (PIA), facing up to 5 years in prison, while your company faces a $500,000 fine and potential debarment from all future government work.
You can also be a contracting officer or someone materially involved in the procurement evaluation or award. This is also very serious and can cause civil and criminal consequences.
This is not a simple business ethics issue; it is a federal crime. The Procurement Integrity Act, codified at 41 U.S.C. § 2101-2107 and implemented in FAR 3.104, is aggressively enforced by the Department of Justice (DOJ). The government does not need to prove you paid for the information, only that you “knowingly” obtained or disclosed sensitive contractor bid or proposal information or source selection information. You need more than just a lawyer; you need a team of specialized Government Procurement Integrity Act lawyers who have been on the other side and know how to dismantle the government’s case.
We Help You With Case Dismissal or a More Favorable Negotiated Outcome
When you are facing the immense power of the federal government, you need a clear objective. Our mission as your Procurement Integrity Act lawyers is unambiguous: to get your case or investigation dismissed entirely, or to negotiate a more favorable outcome that protects your business, your reputation, and your freedom. We achieve this by immediately challenging the government’s evidence, dissecting the “knowledge” element of their case, and leveraging our experience as former federal prosecutors and government contracting officials to negotiate from a position of strength. We are not here to manage your surrender; we are here to increase your chances of winning.
Meet Our PIA Lawyers and National Defense Contractor Fraud Team Leads
Our national lead attorney has over 20 years of experience in federal procurement. Theodore P. Watson (U.S. Air Force Retired Veteran and Former Federal Procurement Official). He is a United States Supreme Court – Licensed attorney with extensive federal criminal defense experience who is committed to defending federal contractors against False Claims Act charges.Call and Speak Directly to Mr. Watson at 1.866.601.5518.
Cheryl Adams (Associate Attorney – Former Federal Contracting Officer)
Cheryl Adams is an Associate Attorney with Watson and Associates, LLC. She is a former federal Contracting Officer with years of hands-on experience with all phases of federal procurement. She brings to clients an intimate understanding of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) and an insider perspective on the procurement processes of a federal government headquarters. She understands the government’s relationships with small businesses and subcontractors, as well as relationships with Fortune 500 corporations.
She has worked side by side with government auditors and personally conducted government property audits. She has handled all sizes of contract award from micropurchases through major systems.
She has cradle-to-grave hands-on operational experience with all phases and all types of government contracting processes, from acquisition planning through contract closeout. Read more..
Chris Mancini – Of Counsel (Former DOJ Prosecutor)
Chris Mancini, Counsel, brings 45 years of legal experience to Watson & Associates, to support the firm’s federal white collar defense attorney services, including eight years as an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of Florida (DOJ), where he served as Deputy Chief of both the Criminal Division and Civil Division.
Chris Mancini specializes in navigating the complexities of the federal court system, providing legal advice, investigating cases, and building strong defense strategies to protect the firm’s clients’ rights and achieve the best possible outcome.
He has handled high-profile white collar crime cases and is a well respected criminal defense attorney
If you are a defense contractor and have been indicted or investigated for a federal white collar crime, you should hire experienced white collar crime lawyers to protect your rights and fight back. Read more.
Carolyn L. Oliver – Of Counsel (Former DOJ Prosecutor)
Of Counsel to Watson & Associates, LLC: Carolyn L. Oliver brings over 40 years of distinguished legal experience to Watson & Associates’ Federal White Collar Defense and Investigations practice. As a former DOJ Prosecutor and Assistant United States Attorney in the Major Frauds Section of the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of California, Oliver provides clients with representation from a federal white collar criminal defense attorney who has prosecuted the very types of cases she now defends. Her extensive federal prosecution background, combined with her proven track record in complex criminal defense, positions her as a formidable advocate for corporations, CEOs, and individuals facing high-stakes federal investigations.
As Of Counsel to Watson & Associates’ Federal White Collar Defense and Investigations practice, Oliver focuses her practice on representing companies and individuals in federal criminal and civil investigations and prosecutions by government enforcement agencies, as well as complex federal litigation. She also advises companies on high-profile, complex, and sensitive internal investigations.Read more…
Robert “Bob” Ayers – Of Counsel (Defense Counsel)
Jennifer Higgins (Former SBA Attorney)
Of Counsel to Watson & Associates, LLC: Jennifer Higgins brings a wealth of experience in government procurement and small business law to Watson & Associates. As a former SBA lawyer, and senior attorney for the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA), she offers clients a deep understanding of federal regulations and the inner workings of government agencies. Her background in both federal service and private practice makes her a valuable asset to the firm’s government procurement practice and contractor litigation team. She has the actual background to assist with navigating issues and disputes related to eligibility for, and continued participation in, small business programs such as SBA’s 8(a) BD, SDVOSB, WOSB, and HUBZone programs and the VA’s VetBiz VIP program.Wise D. Allen, Esquire – Of Counsel (Former Military Attorney)
Wise D. Allen, Esquire, a former Veteran Lieutenant Commander Judge Advocate for the United States Military, Wise Allen brings extensive knowledge and experience in resolving corporate defense and litigation in vast international and national legal issues.
Mr. Allen’s federal litigation experience as a former appellate attorney representing the United States and a federal white collar criminal defense attorney for defendants in trials that led to his clients receiving overwhelmingly favorable outcomes in contested issues and obtaining non-contested resolutions. Read more..
What is the Procurement Integrity Act
The Procurement Integrity Act (PIA) is a federal law designed to protect the fairness and integrity of the federal government’s procurement process. The Procurement Integrity Act prohibits the release of source selection and contractor bid or proposal information. Also, a former employee who served in certain positions on a procurement action or contract in excess of $10 million is barred for one year from receiving compensation as an employee or consultant from that contractor.
As stated by the Department of Justice,(U.S. Department of Justice. (2024, July 17). Procurement Integrity. Justice Management Division. Retrieved from https://www.justice.gov/jmd/procurement-integrity) the Act fundamentally “prohibits the release of source selection and contractor bid or proposal information.” [1] This sounds simple, but in practice, it creates a complex web of rules that can easily ensnare even well-intentioned contractors and government employees. Our Procurement Integrity Act lawyers have seen how a casual conversation or a seemingly innocent email can spiral into a criminal investigation.
The law is detailed in the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) under section FAR 3.104. It establishes a strict code of conduct for everyone involved in the procurement lifecycle. The core of the PIA is to prevent any party from gaining an unfair competitive advantage through the improper disclosure or receipt of non-public procurement information. Understanding what constitutes “non-public information” is the first critical step in any defense, a topic our Procurement Integrity Act lawyers focus on from day one.
What is Protected Information?
The government aggressively protects two main categories of information under the PIA:
- Contractor Bid or Proposal Information: Information a contractor creates and submits as part of their bid. According to the official DOJ guidance, this includes cost or pricing data, indirect costs and direct labor rates, proprietary information about manufacturing processes, and any other information the contractor marks as confidential. [1] Sharing this information can also have implications under the Truth in Negotiations Act, which requires contractors to submit certified cost or pricing data.
- Source Selection Information: This is information the government creates to evaluate bids and proposals. It is extremely sensitive and includes bid prices from all competitors, proposed costs, source selection plans, technical evaluations, competitive range determinations, and rankings of bids. [1] Any information marked “Source Selection Information” is strictly off-limits. A Procurement Integrity Act lawyer knows that the government’s case often hinges on proving the defendant knew, or should have known, the information fell into one of these protected categories.
Prohibited Conduct: The Four Pillars of a PIA Violation
The Procurement Integrity Act and FAR 3.104 outline four main categories of prohibited conduct. A violation in any of these areas can trigger a civil or criminal investigation. Our Procurement Integrity Act lawyers defend clients against allegations in all four categories.
- Disclosing Protected Information: A current or former government employee, or anyone acting on behalf of the government, is strictly prohibited from disclosing contractor bid/proposal information or source selection information to any unauthorized person before the contract is awarded.
- Obtaining Protected Information: It is illegal for any person to “knowingly obtain” protected procurement information before the contract award. This is the provision that most often targets contractors. The government does not need to prove you paid for the information, only that you knew you were receiving sensitive information that you were not supposed to have.
- Discussing Non-Federal Employment: A government official who is personally and substantially participating in a procurement valued over the simplified acquisition threshold ($250,000) cannot discuss future employment with a bidding contractor. If contacted, the official must either reject the offer or disqualify themselves from the procurement process. This is a common trap for both government employees and contractors seeking to hire them.
- Accepting Post-Government Compensation: A former government official who served in a key procurement role (like a contracting officer or source selection board member) on a contract exceeding $10 million is barred for one year from accepting any compensation from that contractor. This “one-year ban” is a major focus of DOJ enforcement. Our Procurement Integrity Act lawyers can advise on the specific nuances of this post-employment restriction.
Understanding these prohibitions is critical. A violation is not just an ethics complaint; it is a potential federal crime. The government’s interpretation of these rules is broad, and it will not hesitate to prosecute individuals and companies it believes have crossed the line. This is why you need experienced Procurement Integrity Act lawyers to defend you.
Were you raided with a search warrant – was it valid? Find out more.
The Stakes: Criminal vs. Civil Penalties for a PIA Violation
A Procurement Integrity Act violation is not a mere compliance issue; it is a serious federal offense with devastating potential consequences. The government can pursue both criminal charges against individuals and civil penalties against individuals and companies, often simultaneously. Understanding the severe penalties is the first step in realizing why you need a team of dedicated Procurement Integrity Act lawyers fighting for you.
Criminal Penalties: Your Liberty is at Risk
The DOJ can bring criminal charges against any individual who violates the PIA for the purpose of exchanging information for something of value or to gain a competitive advantage. This is a felony offense.
- Imprisonment: A conviction carries a sentence of up to five years in federal prison.
- Fines: Substantial criminal fines can also be imposed as provided under Title 18 of the U.S. Code.
Civil & Administrative Penalties: Your Business is on the Line
Even if the government decides not to pursue criminal charges, the civil and administrative penalties can be business-ending. The standard of proof is lower in a civil case, making it easier for the government to win.
- Massive Civil Fines: The Attorney General can bring a civil action against any person or organization that violates the PIA.
- For Individuals: A civil penalty of up to $50,000 for each violation, plus twice the amount of any compensation received or offered.
- For Organizations: A civil penalty of up to $500,000 for each violation, plus twice the amount of any compensation received or offered.
- Administrative Actions: Beyond fines, the government can take administrative actions that can cripple a company, including:
- Contract Cancellation: The agency can cancel the procurement if a violation has occurred.
- Contract Rescission: The agency can rescind a contract that has already been awarded.
- Suspension & Debarment: The agency can suspend or debar your company from receiving any future government contracts, which is often a corporate death sentence.
These penalties, outlined in both the statute and FAR 3.104, underscore the gravity of a PIA investigation. You are not just fighting for your reputation; you are fighting for your freedom and the survival of your business. You need Procurement Integrity Act lawyers who understand these stakes and know how to protect you from them.
A Critical Warning from a Federal Procurement Insider
“As a former federal procurement executive, I saw firsthand how seriously the government takes violations of the Procurement Integrity Act and the Truth in Negotiations Act. The regulations in FAR 3.104 are not suggestions; they are tripwires that can lead to criminal prosecution. The biggest mistake a contractor can make is underestimating the danger. When federal agents contact you, they are not there to have a friendly chat; they are there to build a case. You need a defense team that understands the intricate rules of federal procurement and can build a wall between you and the government. Do not try to navigate this alone.”
– Theodore Watson, Former Federal Procurement Executive
Types of 41 U.S.C. 423 PIA Violation Cases Our Procurement Lawyers Handle
- Public procurement policy and controls
- Business ethics
- DOJ and OIG PIA investigations alleged PIA violations
- False Claims Act Procurement Integrity Act investigations
- Procurement fraud defense
- Foreign Corrupt Practices
- Anti-kickback Act prosecutions
- Kickbacks
- False claims and Qui Tam defense
- Help to respond to civil investigative demands CID
- Truth in Negotiations Act
- Compliance with FAR and SBA regulations
AVOID JAIL TIME AND START A SOLID DEFENSE IN YOUR CASE – GET YOUR FREE DEFENSE CHECKLIST HERE
How We Defend You: Dismantling the Government’s Case
A successful defense against a Procurement Integrity Act investigation requires a proactive and multi-faceted strategy. As your Procurement Integrity Act lawyers, we do not simply wait for the government to build its case. We actively work to dismantle it from the inside out. Our approach focuses on several key areas:
Challenging the “Knowledge” Element
The cornerstone of many PIA prosecutions is the requirement that the defendant acted “knowingly.” The government must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that you knew you were obtaining or disclosing protected information. We challenge this by demonstrating that:
- You had a good-faith belief that the information was not protected.
- The information was already publicly available or was common industry knowledge.
- You had no intent to gain a competitive advantage.
Scrutinizing the Government’s Evidence
We meticulously review every piece of evidence the government presents. This includes emails, witness testimony, and forensic data. We look for inconsistencies, procedural errors, and violations of your constitutional rights. Our federal Procurement Integrity Act lawyers are skilled at filing motions to suppress illegally obtained evidence, which can cripple the government’s case.
The Truth in Negotiations Act (TINA) and its Connection to Procurement Integrity
While the Procurement Integrity Act governs the handling of information, the Truth in Negotiations Act (TINA) governs the accuracy of the information itself, specifically cost and pricing data. The two are often intertwined in government investigations. A violation of the PIA—such as obtaining a competitor’s pricing data—can lead investigators to scrutinize your own pricing submissions for violations of the Truth in Negotiations Act.
TINA requires contractors to submit certified cost or pricing data for most negotiated contracts over $2 million and to certify that the data is accurate, complete, and current. If a contractor fails to disclose relevant data that impacts the negotiated price, it can be held liable for “defective pricing.” Our Procurement Integrity Act lawyers are also experts in TINA compliance and defense.
An investigation that begins with a PIA allegation can easily expand into a TINA audit if the government suspects that improperly obtained information was used to manipulate your certified cost data. This dual threat requires a defense team that is fluent in both the ethics rules of the PIA and the complex cost accounting principles of the Truth in Negotiations Act. We provide that integrated defense, ensuring that your response to a PIA inquiry does not inadvertently create liability under TINA.
Negotiating with Prosecutors from a Position of Strength
Our team includes former federal prosecutors who understand how to negotiate with the DOJ. We present our own evidence and legal arguments to demonstrate the weaknesses in their case. This can often lead to a declination (the government dropping the case) or a favorable pre-indictment resolution. Our goal is always to achieve a dismissal, but when necessary, we are prepared to negotiate a resolution that avoids criminal charges and minimizes civil penalties.
Defending Against Related Charges
A PIA investigation often includes related charges, such as violations of the Truth in Negotiations Act (TINA) or the Anti-Kickback Act. Our deep experience in all areas of government contract fraud allows us to provide a comprehensive defense against all potential charges. We understand how these statutes intersect and how to build a defense that addresses the entire scope of the government’s investigation.
What You Need to Know
- The first approach to any case is to asses whether (a) your fit the criteria or intent of the statute and (2) whether you “knowingly disclosed contractor bid or proposal information”. Intent or “knowingly” where the government may have a difficult time proving its case. This is where our high-level procurement integrity attorneys come in.
-
If you are an “outsider”, you cannot, other than as provided by law, knowingly obtain contractor bid or proposal information or source selection information before the award of a Federal agency procurement contract to which the information relates.
- If federal investigators approach or try to speak with you, you have to cooperate. However, you do not want to speak to them without a PIA attorney
- You have a constitutional right NOT to incriminate yourself. Once you waive it ( by agreeing to speak or disclose evidence without legal advice from a procurement attorney, you cannot claim it was a mistake if the disclosure is used against you in a criminal trial.
Get Free Tips on Defending A Government Procurement Fraud Case - Download Now
What should you do if federal agents approach you?
You have an obligation to cooperate with the government regarding a Procurement Integrity Act investigation. What you do NOT have to do is participate in questioning or providing evidence that might incriminate you. You should not speak to federal agents without a procurement lawyer on your team
Did You Receive a Subpoena or Civil Investigative Demand (CID)?
Once again, the government has the authority to request that you produce testimony and or documents. This can be accomplished by issuing a civil investigative demand or subpoena. Again, you should seriously consider hiring a PIA defense procurement lawyer.
Get Free Tips on Defending A Government Procurement Fraud Case - Download Now
Nationwide Procurement Integrity Act Defense Lawyers
Our federal Procurement Integrity Act criminal defense lawyers help clients involved in federal government fraud cases in states including Alaska, Arizona, Alabama federal criminal defense lawyers , Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida federal Procurement Integrity Act attorneys, Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois procurement lawyer, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland Procurement Integrity Act defense lawyer, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri top rated federal criminal defense lawyers, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire federal criminal lawyer, New Mexico federal criminal defense lawyers, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina procurement lawyer, Tennessee, Texas federal Procurement Integrity Act defense lawyers, U.S. Virgin Islands, Utah federal criminal defense lawyer, Vermont, Virginiat procurement integrity act criminal defense attorney, Washington, federal criminal lawyer Washington DC, West Virginia, Wisconsin federal crime lawyer, and Wyoming.
Best federal defense attorney for government contractors, healthcare providers and corporations: Cities in which a Watson federal criminal defense attorney can help include Anchorage, AK; Atlanta, GA; Austin, TX; Baltimore Procurement Integrity Act attorney Maryland, Chicago federal crime lawyer, IL; Colorado Springs, CO; Dallas top rated federal criminal defense lawyers, TX; Denver, Colorado; Indianapolis, IN; Las Vegas, NV; federal crime attorney Los Angeles, CA; best federal criminal defense attorney Miami, FL; Columbia, Germantown, Silver Spring, Maryland top rated federal criminal defense lawyers , Waldorf, Glen Burnie, Ellicott City, Dundalk and Bethesda federal criminal defense lawyers; Philadelphia PA; Houston procurement integrity act lawyers and federal criminal defense attorneys; San Antonio federal crime lawyer, TX; Dallas Texas, Birmingham, Huntsville, Montgomery federal lawyers,, Mobile, Tuscaloosa, Auburn, Talladega, Gulf Shores federal defense attorney, Dauphin Island, Dothan; Los Angeles federal federal Procurement Integrity Act defense attorneys, San Diego, CA; Fort lauderdale top rated federal criminal defense lawyers , FL; San Francisco procurement integrity act criminal defense lawyers CA; Sacramento, CA; San Jose, CA; Santa Clara, CA federal criminal defense lawyers ; and Tampa, FL. Detroit, Chicago,Virginia Beach, Chesapeake, Norfolk, Richmond, best federal criminal defense attorneys in Newport News, Portsmouth, Alexandria, Roanoke, Hampton and Suffolk.
The Procurement Integrity Act, which is codified in 41 USC 423, establishes certain standards of conduct and requirements for government procurement officials, contractors, and subcontractors. Regarding ethics violations in government contracting, the law prohibits certain activities that could compromise the integrity of the procurement process, including:
1. Disclosure of non-public information: Government procurement officials and employees are prohibited from disclosing non-public information about procurements to unauthorized individuals or companies.
2. Receipt of certain information: Government procurement officials and employees are prohibited from receiving certain information from contractors or subcontractors, such as advanced knowledge of their competitors’ bids.
3. Employment: Government procurement officials and employees are prohibited from accepting employment with a contractor or subcontractor who is involved in the same procurement for which the official or employee had significant responsibility.
4. Restrictions on post-government employment: Government procurement officials and employees are subject to certain restrictions on post-government employment with contractors or subcontractors who are involved in the same procurement for which the official or employee had significant responsibility.
5. Restrictions on contractor and subcontractor activities: Contractors and subcontractors who participate in federal procurement are subject to certain restrictions on their activities, such as attempting to obtain non-public information or offering employment to government officials or employees who are involved in the same procurement.
What are Procurement Integrity Act Violations Examples 41 USC 423?
The PIA also establishes certain Procurement Integrity Act violations, including fines, imprisonment, and exclusion from future government contracts. The law is intended to promote a fair and transparent procurement process and to ensure that the government obtains the best value for taxpayer dollars.
When government employees or contractors have violated the Procurement Integrity Act is very fact-specific. Being involved in a government investigation can be very daunting and stressful. Contractors and personnel found to have violated Procurement Integrity law can find themselves losing the contract, subject to hefty civil fines on facing jail time.
Get Free Tips on Defending A Government Procurement Fraud Case - Download Now
Experienced 41 U.S.C. 423 Procurement Integrity Act Lawyers
The government contract defense and procurement fraud attorneys at Watson & Associates help individuals and contractors to defend against allegations of Federal Procurement Integrity law violations and Anti-kickback Act violations under 41 U.S.C. 423. See also FAR 3.104-8 Criminal and civil penalties, and further administrative remedies.
Whether you are subject to a federal investigation, facing possible criminal indictment before a Grand Jury, bidding on federal projects using strategic sourcing or needing help with procurement management policies and controls, our False claims and contractor criminal defense lawyers understand the landmines awaiting clients in the process.
Does Receiving a Government Estimate Fit Within PIA Definition of “Source Selection Information?
In the case of CLC Construction Company, ASBCA No. 59110, the court found that this estimate does not fit within the definition of “source selection information” set forth in PIA. The court reasoned that because the plain language of the statutory text of § 2107(a) of the PIA, which includes express definitions of “source selection information” does not include the government estimate, then this information does not apply in procurement law. See als0 United States v. Bowling, 108 F. Supp. 3d 343, 348 (E.D.N.C. 2015).
41 USC 423 Defense and Help For Federal Employees in the Procurement Process
Under the Procurement Integrity Act, Federal employees who are involved in federal contracting procurements, strategic sourcing, and the administration of procurements over $100,000 must report contacts with bidders or offerors regarding future employment to their supervisors. Under the Procurement Integrity Act 41 USC 423, they must also disqualify themselves from further participation if they do not immediately reject the contract.
Government contractors must avoid gaining sensitive information from procurement officials since it can create a more advantageous opportunity for your company. The Washington, DC government contracts attorneys at Watson & Associates can help with PIA Violations and Conflicts of Interest by the government.
FAR 3.104-8 Criminal and Civil Penalties, and Allowable Administrative Remedies
IAW FAR 3.104-8 on Acquisition.gov Criminal and civil penalties, and administrative remedies, may apply to conduct that violates 41 U.S.C. chapter 21 (see 3.104-3). See 33.102(f) for special rules regarding bid protests. See 3.104-7 for administrative remedies relating to contracts.
(a) An official who knowingly fails to comply with the requirements of 3.104-3 is subject to the penalties and administrative action set forth in 41 U.S.C. 2105.
(b) An offeror who engages in employment discussion with an official subject to the restrictions of 3.104-3, knowing that the official has not complied with 3.104-3(c)(1), is subject to the criminal, civil, or administrative penalties set forth in 41 U.S.C. 2105.
(c) An official who refuses to terminate employment discussions (see 3.104-5) may be subject to agency administrative actions under 5 CFR 2635.604(d) if the official’s disqualification from participation in a particular procurement interferes substantially with the individual’s ability to perform assigned duties.
START DEFENDING YOUR CASE NOW — Speak with a Federal Defense Lawyer Today
Call Our 41 U.S.C. 423 Procurement Integrity Act Lawyers
Please contact the government contract defense lawyers at Watson & Associates, LLC regarding any legal matter related to the Federal Procurement Integrity Act PIA violations under 41 USC 423, ethics violations in government contracting ,strategic sourcing or Anti kickback Act on a federal government contracts project. Our Procurement Integrity Act lawyers can be reached toll-free at 866-601-5518. Speak directly to procurement lawyer Theodore Watson.