We Help Federal Construction Prime and Subcontractors Nationwide Avoid Costly Legal Mistakes With Federal Miller Act Claims. Call for a Free Initial Consultation. 1-866-601-5518.

Federal Miller Act & Surety Bond Claim Lawyers

Federal Construction Law & Miller Act Claim Attorneys


Federal contracting officers can be wrong in their decisions. Lower court judges can also make incorrect rulings given the evidence in the record. As a result, small business and large DOD construction contractors receive unfair court decisions stemming from federal Miller Act claims.

However, In many cases, the decision can be reversed with higher court appeal assisted by an experienced federal construction and Miller Act Claims appeal attorney. The Federal Miller Act provides certain protections for the government, first-tier and second-tier subcontractors that are material suppliers. 


40 USC 3131 Miller Act Claim Legal Services

Areas covered include complying with Miller Act claim notice requirements, payment bond claims, legal support when an agency makes adverse decisions with payment and performance bond claims, Prompt Payment Act disputes, federal construction law representation for sureties  under 48 CFR 28.203 and FAR 28, developing a sound response to:

Our goal is to help to recover monies owed and protect your rights under the Federal Miller Act performance and payment bond statutes and regulations. Our government construction law firm also serves as counsel to corporate attorneys that need assistance in navigating the complex federal regulations and surety disputes.

As a former government contracting executives and lawyers, our attorneys know both sides of the argument. This gives your case a competitive edge.

Surety Rights

“Subrogation is a principle of equity whereby “a surety who pays the debt of another is entitled
to all the rights of the person he paid to enforce his right to be reimbursed.” Pearlman v. Reliance Ins. Co., 371 U.S. 132, 137 (1962).”

Equitable Subrogations

“The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has held that, “[i]f a surety is unable to rely on privity of contract as the jurisdictional basis for a claim against the Government, the surety may be able to invoke the doctrine of equitable subrogation to step into the shoes of the contractor for the purpose of satisfying the jurisdictional requirements of the Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1491(a).” Nat’l Am. Ins. Co. v. United States, 498 F.3d 1301, 1304 (Fed. Cir. 2007).”

Subcontractors and Joint Ventures

Federal Courts will ultimately dismiss your case with prejudice because regardless of any lack of capacity of a joint venture agreement, your individual company is merely a subcontractor with no rights, privity, or standing to sue the Government over the prime contract. See Erickson Air Crane Co. of Washington v. United States, 731 F.2d 810, 813 (Fed. Cir. 1984) (“It is hornbook rule that, under ordinary government prime contracts, subcontractors do not have standing to sue the government under the Tucker Act.”).


With law offices in Washington, DC and Denver, Colorado, Watson & Associates, LLC ‘s Federal Miller Act bond lawyers provide high-level legal advice and litigation support to government construction contractors seeking to either defend or enforce their legal rights.

  • We represent prime contractors, sureties, subcontractors and material suppliers in a vast among of legal disputes involved in bond suits.
  • Aggressive Legal Representation
  • Nationwide Help

Federal Miller Act Claim Appeals

The federal contracting legal system can be intimidating. Many construction contractors and sureties will accept the contracting officer’s and court decisions while standing to lose hundreds of thousands and even millions.  Frequently, when a Miller Act Claims case is examined by a skilled federal contracts appeal attorney, potential causes for the unlawful decision is uncovered. The federal appeal process is designed to give you another chance to present your case before a higher court and to show that either the agency or lower court has made an erroneous decision.  Call us before it’s Too Late.

To Speak to a Federal Miller Act attorney, call us at 1-866-601-5518. Free Initial Consultation.

40 USC 3131 Surety Bond Suits – Who Does the Federal Miller Act Protect?

In federal construction projects, a Federal Miller Act payment bond is intended to protect “all persons supplying labor and material in carrying out the work provided for in the contract,” 40 USC 3131(b)(2). However, surety bond protections of the statute are only intended for certain parties. Although the Federal Miller Act payment bond is intended to protect “all persons supplying labor and material in carrying out the work provided for in the contract,” 40 USC 3131(b)(2), the parties that may assert a Miller Act claim under it are limited to:

  • First-tier subcontractors; i.e., subcontractors who contract directly with the general contractor.
  • Second-tier subcontractors; i.e., subcontractors who contract with a first-tier subcontractor.
  • First-tier material suppliers; i.e., material suppliers who contracted directly with the general contractor.
  • Second-tier material suppliers who contracted with a first-tier subcontractor and not a first-tier material supplier (i.e., material suppliers that supplied a first-tier subcontractor).

Call Our Federal Miller Act Claim Lawyers

For help with federal government construction law, Miller Act claims, miller act payment bond disputes or litigation support under, 40 USC 3131, 48 CFR 28.203 and FAR 28, then contact one of our Federal Miller Act claim surety bond lawyers today for immediate help toll-free at 1-866-601-5518.