Helping Federal Contractors to Avoid the Most Costly Legal Mistakes With Government Suspension and Debarment Exclusion Cases. 1.866.601.5518 FREE INITIAL CONSULTATION.
33% of companies proposed for suspension or debarment find themselves at a disadvantage because, in their responses to the debarment agency, they do not address the relevant issues that could potentially convince the agency official to not proceed.
Without it, companies miss the chance of continuing to do business with the government. Of the 33% of total responses, upwards to 63% of individual or companies end up being suspended or debar actions due to lack of a strong response to the agency. You want to avoid this costly mistake.
At Watson & Associates, LLC, our team of debarment and suspension attorneys ensures that individuals and businesses can reduce their liabilities while safeguarding their revenues from doing business with the federal government. The law firm uses over 30 years of combined experience to protect your federal projects and reputation while safeguarding your bottom line.
Our procurement team includes seasoned professionals who consistently work within the courts and debarring officials and understand how to craft sound legal arguments with supportable facts regarding suspension or debarment issues. We have earned a reputation for gaining favorable results for small businesses through vigorous representation.
How you respond is the most critical aspect of getting a favorable result. Although there are no guarantees, the starting point is to understand relevant procurement regulations and the issues that officials look for to make a decision.
Government Suspension, Business Ethics, and Debarment Legal Services
- Prompt response and turnaround to the debarment agency
- Legal help for a fraction of the cost of larger law firms
- Detailed assessment/response to debarring officials
- Preparing responses and Attendance at hearings
- Responses to Government Investigations and regulations management
- Responses to notices of proposed suspension or debarment
- Administrative compliance agreement negotiation and management
- Corporate governance/compliance policies counseling
- Responses to show cause letters or request for information (“ROI”)
- Contractor business ethics training and compliance
- Mandatory Disclosure and business ethics
- General Services Administration
- Suspension or debarment participation agreements
- Litigation and appeals
Geographically positioned to help individuals and businesses in all states
With law offices in Washington, DC and Colorado, Watson & Associates’ law firm is geographically positioned to help small businesses, large businesses or individuals mitigate the pending problem and to prepare an effective response to the debarment and suspension official. We have a record of success in previous cases and will aggressively help in your situation.
Under FAR 9.4, the federal government may propose suspension and debarment of government contractors. There are several reasons for this to include business ethics, false claims, criminal convictions, or simply providing false statements to the government. These are all serious legal issues that must be dealt with properly.
To debar your company means a potentially crippling effect on your business’s future.
The regulations make it clear that when it comes to debarment and suspension of government contractors, the mere existence of grounds for suspension or debarment under FAR 9.4 does not require suspension or debarment. It is important to have a viable response to the Debarring Officer (SDO).
To convince the SDO that your company is a responsible federal contractor, it is advisable to have a suspension and debarment attorney that understands how the process works and that can help you to propose potential mitigating circumstances that can help the debarring official make a ruling in your favor.
The rationale for no debarment or suspension – since regulations should not be used to punish government contractors, our efforts focus more on responding to the SDO and showing why the company is still a responsible business worthy of doing business with the federal government.
Help with participation agreements – sometimes the agency may decide that it is in the government’s best interest to allow you to do business with the government. In some situations, the SDO may require the parties to enter into a participation agreement. This document is a contract that spells out the terms and conditions of the lifted suspension or debarment. At Watson & Associates, LLC the law firm helps at both the initiation and compliance stage.
Training, internal policies and controls – At times, federal government contractors may be required to develop training plans as a condition to lift the pending action. Our attorneys can help with providing internal training and oversee the requirements proposed by the agency.
Federal Debarment is the state of being excluded from enjoying certain possessions, rights, privileges, or practices and the act of prevention by legal means. Government contractors can be ineligible to bid on or performing federal contracts due to allegations of fraud, mismanagement, business ethics and similar reasons. under federal debarment regulations, corporations, individuals, and non-governmental organizations can be debarred.
Implicit in the debarred meaning, being placed on the federal suspension and debarment list means that a federal contractor or individual is ineligible to do business with the federal government for a specific period of time. Under the debarment meaning and legal definition, the preclusion is for not more than 3 years in most situations.
Federal Contractor – FAR 9.4 Suspension Definition
When a federal agency issues a proposes that a federal contractor to be placed on the suspension or debarment list (EPL), the suspension definition means that the contract is ineligible and temporarily suspended from receiving, bidding on, and even performing on any government contract or grants. When companies face penalties under FAR 9.4, the contractor is temporarily excluded for up to 18 months while they wait for the conclusion of an agency action or government investigation.
FAR 9.4 Process and excluded parties list: The debarment and suspension process starts with the agency’s notice to the contractor or individual. The end result is to be placed on the excluded parties list. This crippling your chances of getting revenues from the government. After receiving the notice, you can submit a written response or appear in person. You have 30 days after receipt to respond in writing. When preparing a response to your notice, building the record with the right evidence and approach is critical.
- There are certain issues that you must address.
- There are also certain strategies that you want to stay away from.
Exclude? Reasons to Debar or Suspend Government Contractors?
There are several reasons to debar and suspend government contractors or exclude individuals from doing business with the federal government. If companies or their officers commit fraud, violate business ethics rules, violate the False Claims Act, are liable for embezzlement charges, bribery, theft, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements or material misrepresentations to the government, tax violation and tax evasion, violation of federal criminal law, found to have committed an unfair trade practice, violation of business ethics or even receiving stolen property. Suspension or debarment actions should not be used simply to punish contractors.
FAR 9.4 Agencies are to do business “with responsible contractors only.” Using discretion, agencies are to suspend or debar to protect the government’s interest in contracting with responsible contractors. Because of the “serious nature of debarment and suspension,” it is a tool that should be used “only in the public interest for the Government’s protection and not for purposes of punishment.” FAR 9.402(a)-(b).
It is the SDO’s responsibility to assess whether exclude a company in suspension or debarment is in the government’s interest—the mere existence a reason does not require a contractor to be suspended or debarred. FAR 9.406-1(a); FAR 9.407-1(b)(2).
The SDO is should consider a list of mitigating factors in your response package, much remedial in nature, before imposing suspension or debarment.
Penalties for misdeeds for business ethics violations may be pursued instead through various remedies available to the Department of Justice, such as the False Claims Act or Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.
Watson’s government suspension and debarment lawyers represent federal contractors in all states including Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, U.S. Virgin Islands, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, Washington, DC, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming.
Cities in which our Washington DC government lawyers help contractors include Anchorage, AK; Atlanta, GA; Austin, TX; Chicago, IL; Colorado Springs, CO; Dallas, TX; Denver, Colorado; Indianapolis, IN; Las Vegas, NV; Los Angeles, CA; Miami, FL; Philadelphia, PA; San Antonio, TX; San Diego, CA; San Francisco, CA; San Jose, CA; Santa Clara, CA; and Tampa, FL.
Call our Washington DC Government Contract Lawyers
To avoid ruining your company’s future in government contracting and to protect against agencies debarring your company or being placed on the federal suspension and debarment list (EPL), contact the federal procurement lawyers at the Washington DC law firm of Watson & Associates toll-free at 866-601-5518. Free Initial Consultation.
Additional Contractor Information
Learn important tips about business ethics when defending and responding to contractor actions.
Read more about Administrative Agreements During Suspension or Debarment.